- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 16:48:02 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
On Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 4:40:28 PM, Tab wrote: TAJ> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org> wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 1:42:40 AM, Tab wrote: >> TAJ> Are we still on track to have a face-to-face April 1st and 2nd, like >> TAJ> we discussed at TPAC? >> Unfortunately not. It took longer than anticipated to get a charter that was ready to send out to the W3C Membership. The review for that is ongoing (ends 12 March) and thus there would not be time to announce the group and have organisations sign up (which involves granting a royalty free license on the eventual specification) in time for a meeting on that date. TAJ> That's fine. >> On the plus side though the charter is now stronger, WOFF is the sole mandated format. TAJ> I'm not sure from reading the charter, but is CWT still allowed to be TAJ> developed as a deliverable under the "WebFonts" line? Its no longer a deliverable of the proposed Working Group. The conformance requirement will be that WOFF must be supported and other formats may be supported. So implementations which plan to support it can of course do so. Just like they may already support other formats (EOT, CFF, raw TT/OT, SVG). Are you aware of implementations which plan to add CWT support? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 15:48:05 UTC