- From: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 09:36:44 -0700
- To: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com> wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2010, at 10:36 AM, Jonathan Kew wrote: > >>> font-feature-settings: LOLZ; >> >> Emphatically YES. > > I thought so. Excellent. Should the spec mention this directly? It says "where <feature-name> is the case-sensitive name of an OpenType feature defined in [OPENTYPE-FEATURES]" and points to the feature registry page. That page makes no mention of the vendor space allowance. Maybe it could say something like: > > ... where <feature-name> is the case-sensitive name of an OpenType feature defined in [OPENTYPE-FEATURES] or a [VENDOR SPACE TAG] as defined in the OpenType specification ... > > [VENDOR SPACE TAG]: http://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/featuretags.htm. Absolutely, yes to all the above. And as mentioned, the risk of "feature hijacking" is real and has been seen a fair bit in desktop fonts. Cheers, T -- "I've discovered the worst place to wander while arguing on a hands-free headset." http://xkcd.com/736/
Received on Tuesday, 22 June 2010 17:05:58 UTC