W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

RE: WOFF and extended metadata

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 21:56:51 +0200
Message-ID: <19452.11139.734883.178695@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
Cc: "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>
Also sprach Levantovsky, Vladimir:

 >  "SHOULD" has a meaning of formal recommendation but gives the UA
 >  developers the rights to decide if and how to implement this. The
 >  meaning is the same, but expressed using the common spec language
 >  according to RFC 2119. I’d rather stick with the common spec
 >  language.

If so, "MAY" is also an option.

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 19:57:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC