W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-font@w3.org > April to June 2010

Re: WOFF and extended metadata

From: Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 11:33:08 -0700
CC: <www-font@w3.org>
Message-ID: <EA117E0F-C14E-4213-B47D-11547A117C0D@adobe.com>
To: <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
Sorry Vlad, I agree it sounds like a UI requirement. Can you imagine a solution that satisfies this recommendation that's not? I can't.

However, I am strongly in favor of some language which specifically addresses this subject (the exposure of metadata to the viewer), so I do support the inclusion of this particular sentence.


On May 25, 2010, at 11:12 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:

> "If the metadata is present, browsers SHOULD provide the means for the Extended Metadata content to be displayed at user's request."
> That is a UI requirement.
> However, phrased that was as a SHOULD, everyone can just ignore it, so I guess it's mostly harmless.
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2010 18:33:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:34 UTC