- From: Erik van Blokland <erik@letterror.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 12:08:01 +0200
- To: "Levantovsky, Vladimir" <Vladimir.Levantovsky@MonotypeImaging.com>
- Cc: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@googlemail.com>, Adam Langley <agl@google.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, Christopher Slye <cslye@adobe.com>, "www-font@w3.org" <www-font@w3.org>, "public-webfonts-wg@w3.org" <public-webfonts-wg@w3.org>
On 21 mei 2010, at 11:31, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote: > If this is not the case, I would like to explore the possibility of providing alternative ways of encoding metadata - e.g. as simple HTML in <fontInfoDialog/> element (or whole metadata as pure HTML/CSS content). In this case, for a browser to satisfy user desire to see the metadata it would have to do what it already does best - show the HTML content provided by a font vendor in a separate pop-up window. I think there is about a week's worth on enbedding html in the W3 list archive somewhere. I don't think a UA will have *any* problem with rendering a couple of XML fields into html. Let's not go there again, please. Erik
Received on Friday, 21 May 2010 10:08:44 UTC