RE: fsType and embedding information

On Wednesday, May 19, 2010 4:49 PM John Hudson wrote:
> 
> Is the follow better? In terms of addressing both your confusion and
> Vlad's request for precise language:
> 
> 	A font's fsType embedding bits 1-3, 8 and 9,
> 	as defined in OS/2 table version 4 or earlier,
> 	do not constitute or imply permission to
> 	create or serve a WOFF file, nor do they prohibit
> 	such action. Web authors should confirm that a
> 	font is licensed for such use.
> 

This is good, thank you John!

Regards,
Vlad

Received on Thursday, 20 May 2010 09:53:56 UTC