Re: ... suggested WOFF changes

Hi,

On 14 May 2010, at 14:11, Levantovsky, Vladimir wrote:
> 
> I would agree with proposed language, but I do believe it makes perfect sense for tools producing WOFF files to check the embedding permissions and issue a warning (as you suggested in one of your previous emails [1]) if "restricted embedding" is the only level specified.

<etc>

Has this discussion drifted beyond servers and clients, the players in the internet data dialogue, and into areas that are outside the realm of W3C?

Best wishes,
Ben 

--

Ben Weiner | http://readingtype.org.uk/about/contact.html 
+44 (0) 7780 608 659

Received on Friday, 14 May 2010 14:17:08 UTC