- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:35:15 -0800
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, www-font@w3.org, www-style@w3.org, Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>
John Daggett wrote: > fantasai wrote: > >>> Yes, the appropriateness is font-specific, but with @font-face we are >>> soon going to be fairly sure about what font we are getting, much of >>> the time (and with the font fallback stack we can be sure to specify >>> as fallback something that is unlikely to trigger an undesired result >>> for selecting alternate ampersand #27). >> I think you're much too optimistic about this. Maybe on desktops in >> the broadband world there will be enough consistency that you can >> ignore the few percent of anomalies, but in other environments font >> downloads are just as likely to be either not available for the >> device/OS or turned off due to limited download speeds or memory. > > I definitely understand the problem with font-specific feature settings > like stylesets being applied to fallback fonts but I think this argument > is dubious, I highly doubt any device that's disabling downloadable > fonts because of size/speed concerns would be one fully supporting all > the features of OpenType layout *and* contain fallback fonts with > font-specific features enabled!! > > Maybe iPhone 4GS-loving penguins in Antartica would be affected perhaps... ;) How about people on a MacBook Pro on an overloaded dial-up connection? Or people on dial-up who have to pay per megabyte? Some countries have such systems. I might want to turn off font downloads if I'm on such a system; doesn't mean I don't have a full-fledged OpenType engine with a set of high-quality fonts installed locally. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 17:35:55 UTC