- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 22:54:39 +0200
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: Tal Leming <tal@typesupply.com>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
On Thursday, October 22, 2009, 10:43:37 PM, Sylvain wrote: >> From: Tal Leming [mailto:tal@typesupply.com] >> Font makers already have enough >> undefined expectations and bugs to guess about and work around. I >> quite strongly do not want to have more of these. It's bad for >> everyone involved -- the OS/app makers, the font makers and, most >> importantly, the users. SG> Yes, a formal CWT spec must define what a font generator (font vendor, tool) SG> must do in order to generate a font file that will work in IE and any browser SG> that implements the spec. Agreed (and we saw a good, although not necessarily complete, list posted earlier by Tal). Are there known things missing from that list? -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Technical Director, Interaction Domain W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 20:54:54 UTC