- From: Erik van der Poel <erik@netscape.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 11:16:47 -0800
- To: David Lemon <typenerd@slip.net>
- CC: www-font@w3.org
David Lemon wrote: > > But for optical and typographic purposes, > nominal ascent and descent are useful for glyph placement, and should not > be tied to bounding box height, depth or width. When you say "nominal ascent and descent", do you mean the ascent and descent that add up to the em square height? Erik
Received on Thursday, 2 December 1999 14:19:32 UTC