- From: <glen@met.bitstream.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 96 21:55:46 est
- To: david@dsiegel.com, www-font@w3.org
- Cc: james@met.bitstream.com, johnc@met.bitstream.com, johns@met.bitstream.com, admin@verso.com, ray@met.bitstream.com, glen@met.bitstream.com
Dear David and Hussein,
Yes we are Font Fanatics. Information below is in response to your
great fonts page "fonts.verso.com". I'll try to make one response per
issue. Glen Rippel
Font Embedding:
1. TrueType fonts contain embedable status bits and only they
should be used to dynamically make decisions if a font can be
embedded or accessed remotely.
2. Type 1 fonts from foundries are sold with licensing models that
are all over the map. Some allow for embedding of fonts for viewing
only, some allow for viewing and printing, and some do not allow
either. The point is that there is no embedding status data
contained in Type1 fonts that can be used by authoring and viewing
software to make these important legal decisions.
3. Subsetting a font to include only the necessary characters is a
good idea only if done carefully. Removing characters and
maintaining the original font format, name, and hint data clearly
violates most font foundries software licenses. The only legal
method we know is to allow the font to be executed by the font
scaler, refit the curves, and recast the data into a neutral
non-infringing data type.
Further, just because TrueType fonts may allow one to embed the
font, it is important to note that the font foundry did not give
the rights to disassemble the fonts or subset the fonts.
Our goal should be to make it easy for the surfer to view a
document with the font fidelity they would like. If they wish to
view the content without font fidelity that should be their choice.
If they would like to have full font fidelity and take the download
hit, they should have this choice also. These choices could be set
within the preferences of the browsers, very similar to turning
graphics on or off. As far a font publishers selling fonts or
giving them away for free that should be the publishers choice and
should not be a consideration. Our goal should be to specify a
clean and legally safe method for selecting font fidelity.
Font Embedding Proposal modification:
Adobe's scheme for embedding fonts in PDF files may seem good, but
it done without regard to the end-users licensing rights granted by
the font foundry.
We purpose that authoring software fully execute the font programs
and cast the data into a non-infringing data structure. At this
point, links to the font fragments or embedding of the neutral font
data is safe and secure. Browser and authoring developers can
control how fonts behave within their applications, and should feel
secure that the specifications and technology are legally sound.
Direct rasterization at high speed or on-demand generation of
TrueType or Type1 fully hinted font formats with temporary install
for printing and viewing would be ideal. Also anti-alias support
would be a definite plus. TrueDoc is the only font technology
designed with all of these factors taken into consideration.
Surfers get the level of font fidelity they desire.
Authors get to publish with any fonts they desire.
Font Foundries safer and enjoy the larger publisher market.
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 1996 01:55:19 UTC