W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2014

Re: CfC: publish WG Note of UI Events; deadline November 14

From: Pradeep Kumar <pradeep.online00@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 20:14:42 +0530
Message-ID: <CANkj6u=TGdYDZ5S-=87vSed480cWXOqqvB2a=RDkv=Q9aLJvBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Cc: (wrong string) šоˆма€‡ик) <garykac@chromium.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
+1
On 19-Nov-2014 8:07 pm, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Although there appears to be agreement that work on the [uievents] spec
> > should stop, the various replies raise sufficient questions that I
> consider
> > this CfC (as written) as failed.
> >
> > Travis, Gary - would you please make a specific proposal for these two
> > specs? In particular, what is the title and shortname for each document,
> and
> > which spec/shortname becomes the WG Note?
> >
> > After we have agreed on a way forward, I'll start a new CfC.
> >
> > (I believe the Principle of Least Surprise here means considering specs
> that
> > currently reference [uievents] or [DOM-Level-3-Events]. F.ex., I suppose
> a
> > document titled "UI Events" with a shortname of DOM-Level-3-Events could
> be
> > a bit confusing to some, although strictly speaking could be done.)
>
> My proposal would be to update UI Events with the latest editor's
> draft of DOM Level 3 Events (title renamed, of course) and have the
> DOM Level 3 Events URL redirect to UI Events. That would communicate
> clearly what happened.
>
>
> --
> https://annevankesteren.nl/
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2014 14:45:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:23 UTC