- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 11:22:06 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Stephen Chenney <schenney@chromium.org>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Stephen Chenney <schenney@chromium.org> wrote: >> I took another look at the usage data now that it has been in Chrome for a >> while. >> >> hasFeature appears in just over 4% of page views (higher than the initial >> estimates) but it returns false only 0.0036% of the time. >> >> It seems to me that it is entirely safe to remove this from the spec and >> have it always return true during some deprecation period. > > https://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-domimplementation-hasfeature still > requires that. Hopefully the change sticks this time and we can call > it a day :-) That's definitely within Blink's "acceptable to kill" range, so it seems likely to me that it'll be okay to just have it as a useless always-returning-true wart. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 16 September 2014 18:22:53 UTC