- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:07:02 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, David Håsäther <hasather@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:00 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > I'd like to be clear on what the proposal is for closest(). Is it: > > 1) Pass the element that closest() was called on as the :scope elements > argument to all the calls up the parent chain. > > or > > 2) Pass the element that you're matchign against as the :scope elements > argument. > > ? #2 is what you get if you desugar closest() in terms of matches(), but #1 > seems to be closer to the use case Tab is thinking of, right? 1) makes the most sense to me and what I was planning on going with. But yes, polyfilling would become harder. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2014 16:07:30 UTC