[Bug 26396] New: innerHTML depends on node document; doesn't look at element context

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=26396

            Bug ID: 26396
           Summary: innerHTML depends on node document; doesn't look at
                    element context
           Product: WHATWG
           Version: unspecified
          Hardware: PC
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: DOM Parsing and Serialization
          Assignee: Ms2ger@gmail.com
          Reporter: dschulze@adobe.com
        QA Contact: sideshowbarker+domparsingspec@gmail.com
                CC: mike@w3.org, public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org,
                    www-dom@w3.org

http://domparsing.spec.whatwg.org/#innerhtml

[[
On getting, if the context object's node document is an HTML document, then the
attribute must return the result of running the HTML fragment serialization
algorithm on the context object; otherwise, the context object's node document
is an XML document,
]]

Currently innerHMTML just looks at the node document. This is maybe not enough.
The elements context itself seems to be interesting as well to set the
namespace of elements.

<div><svg id="svg"></svg></div>
<script>
document.getElementById('svg').innerHTML = '<g><rect width="100"
height="100"/></g>';
</script>

doesn't work.

while

<div><svg id="svg"></svg></div>
<script>
document.getElementById('svg').innerHTML = '<svg><g><rect width="100"
height="100"/></g></svg>';
</script>

works in most browsers. (In all, if it gets called on <div>.)

It gets of course more complicated when innerHTML is called on an element
within <foreignObject>:

    <foreignObject width="100" height="50"
                   requiredExtensions="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
      <!-- XHTML content goes here -->
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Here is a paragraph that requires word wrap</p>
      </body>
    </foreignObject>

Here the node document is probably not the SVG root document.

Also, for standalone SVG files, it would be great if authors don't need to
specify the SVG namespace on elements in the "value" string. With the text
above, it seems to be necessary. At least it is not clear to me how the output
would be an SVG element.

Especially for HTML documents with SVG content, this issue has been brought up
to the SVG WG many times.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Received on Monday, 21 July 2014 10:03:50 UTC