- From: Ms2ger <ms2ger@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 18:51:05 +0200
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>, www-dom@w3.org
- CC: W3C WAI Protocols & Formats <public-pfwg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Shane, On 07/17/2014 06:44 PM, Shane McCarron wrote: > Hi! > > At a recent W3C PFWG meeting, the group (again) lamented the lack > of a standard way to get a list of all the Event listeners (of a > specific type, at a specific element, etc) in the DOM. > > We are happy to put together a proposal about this, with use cases, > but we are not sure if we should target this at the DOM itself or > at the DOM Events specification. > > Obviously we are not looking to rock the boat here w.r.t DOM4 or > anything. We are just trying to figure out who we should be talking > to about getting this included in some future specification. The DOM specification is a living standard, so don't worry about rocking boats. However, this has been discussed and rejected several times before; is there any new information that suggests a reasonable chance to overturn those decisions? If not, I would advise against reopening the discussion. HTH Ms2ger -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTx/75AAoJEOXgvIL+s8n2Ok0IAI2u0Jwka4Dqyi0VcGQgvYRJ cbAq8agq287hSyplUSJ6VmDvQbD4slDLRvVCuwS7hCAOSpoUsKIxgu4WNJhaUEhJ hDtBGHnvL3JxD0jk3Jmf1Zn5lY98nms9cevpjWHWEjo8qrXbWrf4wfc5KeHeltWX uKEk2Rm4ggO2RxZjQDMcT3l6OeVRXqbBf8czn9qW8oGJq6XFLN7/4t16Uwg0nkCA YyUO5OO7qnpE7wC5Y3R6u131BWx4LmONfxufERtfhqRHgm4E/TlBb0stXqcukv1K NI7CToBc2toRQ+f6Tu/n9GhqgdTSNbli27dACOaPiJv5nAv/xEZTGuriFt0TRko= =tH6j -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2014 16:51:45 UTC