- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:35:44 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, DOM public list <www-dom@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:33 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> It returns undefined in all implementations. (I didn't test this and >> just went by your word initially, reverting that now.) > > It does work in Safari, but not Firefox or Chrome: > http://software.hixie.ch/utilities/js/live-dom-viewer/saved/2892 And > there is no other member that has such a pointer. This seems to indicate that both Firefox and Chrome supports ownerElement in actual released builds. https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25086#c8 So do we have any data actually indicating that the web does *not* depend on this property? Seems silly to remove this given that it creates a less elegant API, and that it doesn't really reduce implementation burden (you still have to have a reference back to the element from the Attr object). / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 18 March 2014 20:36:50 UTC