W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: hasFeature()

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 15:13:09 +0000
Message-ID: <CADnb78goH=4E-iA7pc-DHO6YjXbzBSebMsvp+QBm7+7dWmQGiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Cc: Stephen Chenney <schenney@chromium.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote:
> The counters have been in for a while now:
>
> http://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/230
> http://www.chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/231
>
> These are not the numbers used to make decisions to deprecate or
> remove, but I think it gives a ballpark estimate of where it's going
> to end up. hasFeature itself is just above the 0.03% threshold for
> removal, and returning false is far below it.
>
> I suggest changing the spec to always return true now, and to track
> the other counter for a while longer before deciding.

Done: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/commit/2e6526d447637de3b44813e90b15edadbcdcd10b


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 17 March 2014 15:13:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:22 UTC