- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:29:07 +0000
- To: Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Axel Dahmen <brille1@hotmail.com> wrote: > But, well, that's, too, even one more point for having had MutationObserver > being a Node's member as it doesn't make any sense to observe a Node you > don't have any more references to in code. As I said you often do keep a reference to the node. E.g. document.head.appendChild(document.body) will first remove document.body and then insert it again. It would be bad if the observer was destroyed while this operation took place as subsequent document.body.appendChild(...) invocations would go unrecorded. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 11 February 2014 19:29:34 UTC