W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > January to March 2014

Re: hasFeature()

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 13:04:48 +0100
Message-ID: <52D7CAE0.9040605@w3.org>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
CC: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
On 16/01/2014 12:39 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> http://dom.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-domimplementation-hasfeature has a
> weird lifeline basically for SVG and an open issue related to that
> since it's not exactly clear what the details should be. Is SVG moving
> away from the fantastical feature testing world as well? Should we
> just simply always return true?

I don't think this has been considered good practice in the SVG 
community for at least a decade. It's worth a shot always returning true 
and seeing if that breaks anything.

Note that IndieUI had recently started using it but thankfully it was 
caught and removed. I reckon it's safe.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Thursday, 16 January 2014 12:04:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 20 October 2015 10:46:22 UTC