Re: DOMError Status

On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 6/5/14, 7:15 AM, Glenn Adams wrote:
>
>> Lack of a binding on window.DOMError or lack of a constructor would
>> constitute non-implementation at first order.
>>
>
> A UA can have no window.DOMError but still return objects that implement
> the relevant interface from API methods, for what it's worth.  Which is
> what at least some Chrome versions do.


It could; however, that would violate WebIDL semantics since DOMError has
no [NoInterfaceObject]. So it would not be a conforming implementation.


>
>
> -Boris
>