- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 18:06:19 +0100
- To: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
- Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
(Added back the other lists.) On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net> wrote: > Let's put done back in. It's the right thing. Given what has been said thus far https://github.com/domenic/promises-unwrapping/issues/19 my inclination is still to leave it out initially and give a version without done() six months to a year to mature. Not having done() can make promises harder to debug in the short term, but adding done() is trivial to do later. And given the lack of native promise implementations to date there's no way for us to test the done()-less design without trying it first. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 8 September 2013 17:06:58 UTC