From: Kevin Smith [zenparsing@gmail.com] > Indeed, for a non-GUI embedding like Node, they *must* be debuggable using just a console. This is an important point. A provisional idea that preserves our desire to not introduce new features to promises themselves, requiring user choice at authoring time, might be some kind of `console.unhandledRejections()` function which returns you a snapshot of the current unhandled rejections bucket. > Another option is a static method which takes a promise and throws rejections ala done: > > ```js > Promise.throw(makeSomePromise.then(...)); > ``` I find these kind of things confusing. RSVP did something similar, introducing ```js RSVP.rethrow = r => setImmediate(() => throw r); ``` so that you write ```js somePromise.then(...).catch(RSVP.rethrow); // actually RSVP uses `fail`. ``` It's not clear to me why this, or your `Promise.throw`, is better than ```js somePromise.done(...) // or somePromise.then(...).done() ```Received on Thursday, 5 September 2013 16:05:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:03 UTC