Re: Promises: final steps

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kevin Smith <> wrote:
> This looks like good work.  I like the name "cast" in particular, as I can
> imagine a future casting operator which provides sugar for the cast function
> defined on a constructor.
> The only concern I have is over error-swallowing.  What's the approach for
> this minimal API?

As far as I know, the current plan is still that devtools should
handle swallowed exceptions, since we got rid of .done() some time
ago.  Plans may have changed without me knowing, though!


Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 18:35:50 UTC