On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com> wrote: > This looks like good work. I like the name "cast" in particular, as I can > imagine a future casting operator which provides sugar for the cast function > defined on a constructor. > > The only concern I have is over error-swallowing. What's the approach for > this minimal API? As far as I know, the current plan is still that devtools should handle swallowed exceptions, since we got rid of .done() some time ago. Plans may have changed without me knowing, though! ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 18:35:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:03 UTC