Re: Promises: final steps

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com> wrote:
> This looks like good work.  I like the name "cast" in particular, as I can
> imagine a future casting operator which provides sugar for the cast function
> defined on a constructor.
>
> The only concern I have is over error-swallowing.  What's the approach for
> this minimal API?

As far as I know, the current plan is still that devtools should
handle swallowed exceptions, since we got rid of .done() some time
ago.  Plans may have changed without me knowing, though!

~TJ