- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 11:35:03 -0700
- To: Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Kevin Smith <zenparsing@gmail.com> wrote: > This looks like good work. I like the name "cast" in particular, as I can > imagine a future casting operator which provides sugar for the cast function > defined on a constructor. > > The only concern I have is over error-swallowing. What's the approach for > this minimal API? As far as I know, the current plan is still that devtools should handle swallowed exceptions, since we got rid of .done() some time ago. Plans may have changed without me knowing, though! ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2013 18:35:50 UTC