- From: Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:42:19 +0900
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: "www-dom@w3c.org" <www-dom@w3c.org>
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 04:42:46 UTC
> > I'm reluctant to do any work on timing aspects of promises until > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22296 is resolved as > that will require revisiting the entire model. I see. I filed a bug https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22982 as a memory ticker. Thanks, On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:33 AM, Yutaka Hirano <yhirano@google.com> wrote: > > I think the spec has a problem at this point, is that correct? > > I'm reluctant to do any work on timing aspects of promises until > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22296 is resolved as > that will require revisiting the entire model. > > I'm also still awaiting input from es-discuss > http://esdiscuss.org/topic/promises-consensus-with-a-terminology with > regards to how we want the guts of promises to work. Getting answers > there seems rather hard :/ I'll keep trying though for now. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Friday, 16 August 2013 04:42:46 UTC