- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 13:05:07 +0200
- To: 'Anne van Kesteren' <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
This is not just for debugging. Looking at the example I give in the mail, i.e. when the attempt to create a TCP socket fails I expect the web application to handle each error situation ("no network contact","peer does not respond", "local address/port pair is already in use") differently. Claes > -----Original Message----- > From: annevankesteren@gmail.com [mailto:annevankesteren@gmail.com] On > Behalf Of Anne van Kesteren > Sent: den 8 augusti 2013 12:56 > To: Nilsson, Claes1 > Cc: Jonas Sicking; www-dom@w3.org; public-sysapps@w3.org > Subject: Re: [DOMError]: Subclassing DOMError to increase granularity > of error handling? > > On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Nilsson, Claes1 > <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com> wrote: > > Sorry, I don't follow. I thought I explained the issue earlier in > this thread. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public- > sysapps/2013Aug/0004.html. > > That message does not make it clear why the granularity is desired at > the application layer. E.g. do you expect these to be used mostly for > debugging or do you expect the implementation to do different things > depending on the error it gets? If it's the former having whatever > error name is fine as long as the message is detailed and debugging > tools are good. If it's the latter we might need something else. > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 8 August 2013 11:05:41 UTC