Re: MutationObserver does not observe state changes

Love it. When are you guys gonna implement Object.observe =-) ?

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 7/31/13 1:03 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>>
>> Maybe just certain properties should be called out as observable (i.e.
>> change records will be fired for them). The motivation would be to eliminate
>> the plethora of "xchanged" events we keep introducing into specs, in favor
>> of a centralized mechanism.
>
>
> Fwiw, this seems pretty reasonable to me.
>
> -Boris
>

Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 19:46:07 UTC