W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: MutationObserver does not observe state changes

From: Rafael Weinstein <rafaelw@google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2013 12:45:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CABMdHiS-iSYA+fUPVHOkdyKAHfwwkAmHVaWgWS7wz6bZM__mXg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Love it. When are you guys gonna implement Object.observe =-) ?

On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 7/31/13 1:03 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote:
>>
>> Maybe just certain properties should be called out as observable (i.e.
>> change records will be fired for them). The motivation would be to eliminate
>> the plethora of "xchanged" events we keep introducing into specs, in favor
>> of a centralized mechanism.
>
>
> Fwiw, this seems pretty reasonable to me.
>
> -Boris
>
Received on Thursday, 1 August 2013 19:46:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:03 UTC