On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 7:39 AM, Kellen Holmes <kellen.holmes@gmail.com> wrote: > So, I guess my question is: can you provide the rationale for such a change > (I am mostly curious, to get a better understanding)? And, is there a better > way to work around this change than the solutions I mentioned? Attr was a node in the original design of the DOM mostly because it could have child nodes. That was never implemented so keeping them around as complex objects made no sense. We still need to see whether this actually works compatibility-wise. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 18:10:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:37:03 UTC