Re: proposal for a new acceptNode() return value for TreeWalker.

On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 8/12/12 4:16 PM, Ms2ger wrote:
>> I would be interested to hear if there is implementer interest in this
>> feature.
>
> Dunno if this counts as interest, but it makes sense to do this, imo, and
> implementing should not be that hard.

Boris, Leo,

Could you maybe take a look at
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18540#c3 and comment
there?

Cheers,


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 16:58:07 UTC