- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:02:15 -0800
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANMdWTsyt8FoZW48GveTSD6FTgEtuzGJFJ9i=gtL5G63WoY_GA@mail.gmail.com>
Warnocked! WebKit just got relatedTarget on focus/blur. I take the silence as there being no opposition, since there wasn't a clear reason for excluding them in the first place. Would be great if we could update the spec. On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > Went ahead and filed the bug: > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19804. > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Right now relatedTarget is specced as being null on blur/focus. Why don't >> these just match focusout/focusin? >> >> Doing some spec archaeology, it looks like relatedTarget was specced as >> having the same value as target on blur/focus and then set to null in >> response to >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2010JanMar/0010.html. >> >> It seems to me that there's no downside to making relatedTarget do the >> same thing on focus/blur that is does on focusout/focusin respectively. >> From a web developers perspective, the only difference should be whether >> the event bubbles or not and whether it fires before/after focus has >> shifted. >> >> I know this is late in the cycle, but I just noticed this and this seems >> reasonable to include in the level 3 version of this spec. >> >> Ojan >> > >
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2013 18:03:07 UTC