- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:33:01 +0100
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:53 PM, James Graham <jgraham@opera.com> wrote: > That we are prepared to risk future headaches because we didn't allow for > the possibility of future additions to this part of the platform? What future headaches? As I said before, thus far we never found a need to expand this kind of API. See setInterval(), addEventListener(), ... Furthermore, returning an object means keeping a larger object in memory, it means we need to decide if it should have a constructor and what the purpose of said constructor is going to be. -- http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 13:33:28 UTC