Re: Better event listeners

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 1:53 PM, James Graham <> wrote:
> That we are prepared to risk future headaches because we didn't allow for
> the possibility of future additions to this part of the platform?

What future headaches? As I said before, thus far we never found a
need to expand this kind of API. See setInterval(),
addEventListener(), ... Furthermore, returning an object means keeping
a larger object in memory, it means we need to decide if it should
have a constructor and what the purpose of said constructor is going
to be.


Received on Friday, 11 January 2013 13:33:28 UTC