- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 17:58:13 -0600
- To: Jake Verbaten <raynos2@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 23:58:44 UTC
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Jake Verbaten <raynos2@gmail.com> wrote: > using an object also allows for future scope creep. Returning a function > makes the API simple and reduces complexity. > What you're suggesting is intentionally using a limited mechanism to prevent the addition of future features, under the assumption that anything we might want to add in the future is bad. I hope you'll reconsider that argument. :) Reject features after they've been proposed and considered--not before they've even been thought of. It's not complex to return an object. It's a universal concept on the platform. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Tuesday, 8 January 2013 23:58:44 UTC