- From: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:50:56 -0500
- To: ext Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>, Jacob Rossi <Jacob.Rossi@microsoft.com>
- CC: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, "public-pointer-events@w3.org" <public-pointer-events@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
On 1/7/13 8:22 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 2:12 AM, Jacob Rossi wrote: > >> It's published as an Editor's Draft by the Web Apps WG under the name "DOM 4 Events." > When I said published, I meant on /TR/. Has the Web Apps Working Group agreed to publish this specification (under the current name)? I don't see this specification either in the charter or in the list of published specs: I think DOM 4 Events is within the scope of WebApps' current charter (f.ex. see <http://www.w3.org/2012/webapps/charter/#maintenance>). > If the specification has not been approved for publication by the Working Group, it should not use the ED template. I think it is OK for <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/d4e/raw-file/tip/source_respec.htm> to use the W3C's ED template since it is within WebApps' scope (even though we all acknowledge there has been no CfC to publish a FPWD). > http://html5labs.interoperabilitybridges.com/dom4events/ I agree the above should not use the W3C ED template. -AB
Received on Monday, 7 January 2013 13:51:23 UTC