- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 08:53:57 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- CC: www-dom@w3.org, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, Bobby Holley <bholley@mozilla.com>
On 12/24/12 1:54 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > I mean that he was hoping Web IDL would solve this. Ah. I think .contentWindow and .contentDocument, at least, make it pretty hard to solve in WebIDL per se.... > Was the second paragraph also unclear? No, I'm just not sure what the best approach is to document.open. > Right, but that involves nodes ;-) Though even there I think if we > clearly stipulate what objects are associated with a node from a > specification perspective we could make it very clear what needs to > happen (assuming all specification writers play ball...). Yeah, agreed. > Not sure how > easy it would be to implement, but if the list of associated objects > was clear you could just enumerate them and replace their > [[Prototype]] per the unwritten algorithm in Web IDL... Yes, I think this is correct. -Boris
Received on Monday, 24 December 2012 16:54:31 UTC