- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:15:02 -0700
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 21:15:51 UTC
Went ahead and filed the bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19804. On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: > Right now relatedTarget is specced as being null on blur/focus. Why don't > these just match focusout/focusin? > > Doing some spec archaeology, it looks like relatedTarget was specced as > having the same value as target on blur/focus and then set to null in > response to > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2010JanMar/0010.html. > > It seems to me that there's no downside to making relatedTarget do the > same thing on focus/blur that is does on focusout/focusin respectively. > From a web developers perspective, the only difference should be whether > the event bubbles or not and whether it fires before/after focus has > shifted. > > I know this is late in the cycle, but I just noticed this and this seems > reasonable to include in the level 3 version of this spec. > > Ojan >
Received on Wednesday, 31 October 2012 21:15:51 UTC