- From: Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga <garaizar@deusto.es>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:59:17 +0200
- To: www-dom@w3.org
Hi there, on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:35:34 -0700 "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > I think Event.timeStamp should use a concept similar to > DOMHighResTimeStamp as defined in http://www.w3.org/TR/hr-time/ > instead, except it may for compatibility need to be an integral type > rather than a floating-point type, and it should be defined to be > the time that the event occurred (or will occur; see > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2010OctDec/0070.html ). *Very* interested in this feature. It would be a huge advance on the reliability of these timestamps when events occur during a UI thread blocking task. -- Pablo Garaizar Sagarminaga Universidad de Deusto Avda. de las Universidades 24 48007 Bilbao - Spain Phone: +34-94-4139000 Ext 2512 Fax: +34-94-4139101
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 20:59:49 UTC