- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:24:18 +1300
- To: olli@pettay.fi
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-dom@w3.org, Stig Halvorsen <stighal@opera.com>
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:27:55 UTC
> > Quite horrible special case. APIs should be consistent whenever possible. > Can you think of a realistic scenario where developers would be burned by this? I think someone would have to retain a reference to the old text node, set textContent on the element, then do something with the old text node and expect it to NOT have changed. Seems a bit unrealistic to me. On the other hand, the practical benefit is real. Rob -- "If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John 1:8-10]
Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2012 20:27:55 UTC