- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 19:06:44 -0500
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, www-dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 00:08:27 UTC
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure it would. toBlob has no concept of canceling, and setInterval and > setTimeout both have canceling systems that require passing a numeric > identity instead of the original arguments. > Using a completely different binding method depending on where the callback is going would just be piling more inconsistencies onto the platform. -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 00:08:27 UTC