- From: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:20:08 -0700
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>, www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:20:59 UTC
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 6/12/12 2:37 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote: > >> Your reply didn't come through and I couldn't find it on the www-dom or >> public-webapps archives. All I saw was Elliott's response. Mind sending >> it again? >> > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/www-dom/2012AprJun/**0106.html<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2012AprJun/0106.html> Oh, sorry, I thought you were talking about your initial reply. On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 6/12/12 1:48 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > >> (or insert doctypes at all since they have no effect). > > > The most likely way a doctype would be inserted is if some script is > blindly doing node processing on existing nodes without worrying about > their types. I don't see the problem here. What's the downside if a script is doing this and the serialized version of that document is invalid?
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 20:20:59 UTC