W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-dom@w3.org > October to December 2011

Improving the DOM; rev 2

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:02:59 +0100
To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v447u9ni64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
Before: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2011OctDec/0140.html

I forgot to explain before that we do not want to expose these methods  
where they do not make sense. The current DOM has that, but I do no think  
that is a particularly good design, and it is not a design we have used  
elsewhere in the platform. Java and its casts are not a concern for the  

It seems however people do not want to restrict these methods so far you  
get limitations. Taking that into account I think this is the API you end  
up with:

union ContentNode = DOMString Node;

Document / DocumentFragment / Element


DocumentType / Element / CharacterData


The next question is whether we should impose restrictions on these  
methods at the IDL or method implementation level. E.g. appending a  
DocumentType to Document can be fine, but appending it to Element is never  
fine. Also currently you know that appendChild(DocumentFragment) on an  
Element is going to work. With these vararg methods you do not, unless the  
arguments are restricted at the IDL level, or otherwise at the method  
implementation level. I no longer feel strongly where we do this, but I  
believe Ojan had some concerns with respect to performance.

As to what these methods return, we should probably go with chaining. I'm  
not a big fan, but it seems to be what all the cool kids are doing these  
days, and the cost is negligible.

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 13:03:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:36:59 UTC