On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> But I think this syntax is far more concise and readable than anything
>> else proposed so far, and it's also likely to be the most efficient
>> (only one function call). This is the only kind of syntax that will
>> actually displace innerHTML and all its XSS problems.
>>
>
> Agreed. Although, I share Ryosuke's sadness that it encourages having lots
> of whitespace textnodes everywhere in your DOM. Not sure what we could do
> about that.
>
Maybe we need another quasi that ignores whitespace?
- Ryosuke