- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:53:55 -0800
- To: www-dom <www-dom@w3.org>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "Charles McCathieNevile" <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: "Web Applications Working Group WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Doug Schepers" <schepers@w3.org>
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:40:47 -0800, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:54:31 +0100, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> > wrote: >> On Nov 9, 2011, at 15:19 , Arthur Barstow wrote: >>> Doug, All - as a followup to the short conversation on October 31 re >>> moving the traversal part of Element Traversal to DOM4, do you have >>> any thoughts on what, if anything, should be done? >> >> Is there any reason that more than pasting it into DOM4 plus whatever >> stylistic arrangements the editor likes would be needed? > > None that I can see, and no reason not to do that that I can think of. FWIW, this has been done long ago. I think the question was more what we want to do with the Element Traversal document itself. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 17:54:37 UTC