- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 00:30:56 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- cc: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > > > I do not think there should be a difference in how feedback is handled > > based on where in the W3C process the specification falls. > > That might be so. But W3C process binds this group, rather than vice > versa. There's nothing magical about the W3C process that binds up. Bureaucracy is opt-in -- you have to want to follow it to do so. You're not a mindless automaton. If you want to follow it that's fine, but that implicitly means you agree that it's a good idea worth following. > Please take it up with your AC rep, or directly with the relevant people > at W3C. What makes you think that I have not? Fundamental changes like this by their very nature must be discussed at all levels. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Saturday, 15 October 2011 00:34:46 UTC