- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:11:14 +0200
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011 08:40:13 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Jacob Rossi wrote: >> >> We'd like to request a Call for Consensus to publish DOM3 Events as a >> Candidate Recommendation. > > While I do not object to publishing any specs, I still think in this > particular instance that the approach taken by the DOM Core spec in > integrating DOM Core and DOM Events, and specifying DOM Events in a more > concise way, is the better approach. I would recommend removing the DOM > Events model from this specification, leaving only the definitions of the > actual events ('click', etc). Do you mean this as a late last call comment, as a request to put those features 'at risk', or as an objection to publishing the spec? (FWIW I agree that we should improve the specs. I think DOM4 is doing that, and we should publish this snapshot through the process and be done with it). cheers -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Friday, 14 October 2011 14:11:56 UTC