- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 18:35:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>, Olli@pettay.fi, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 16:54:25 +0200, Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi> > wrote: > > So you ended up removing the widely long-ago-implemented > > initProgressEvent after all? Any reason why? > > Because it's not needed? I plan to remove all the init*Event() members in any specs I edit also, FWIW. If there are any that are widely implemented enough that that would be a compat issue, please let me know. (I doubt any are actually being used, so I'm not particularly concerned.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 18:36:21 UTC