- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 17:54:25 +0300
- To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On 06/24/2011 11:35 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 5:16 AM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:16:10 +0200, Jonas Sicking<jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >>> >>> You'll likely want a different dictionary for each constructor, so I >>> suspect you'll need the annotation for interface. It'll be a bit more >>> work to spec, but it should make it a lot easier for implementors and >>> authors to read. >> >> Done. >> >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#interface-event >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/domcore/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#interface-customevent >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/#interface-progressevent So you ended up removing the widely long-ago-implemented initProgressEvent after all? Any reason why? -Olli >> >> I guess I will write a new blog post as well. > > Awesome! This looks great! > > / Jonas > >
Received on Monday, 27 June 2011 14:55:08 UTC