- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 17:46:55 +0200
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:07:58 +0200, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jun 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> How would you define >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/#interface-progressevent in a >> more simple manner? Defining the mapping for the dictionary is rather >> trivial, but I agree that if we can make it more trivial or unnecessary >> even, that would be nice. > > "The lengthComputable attribute must return the value it was initalised > to. Its default value is false." > > Then in the definition of the constructor: "Initialise all attributes to > their default values. For each attribute with name /foo/ in the > dictionary, initialise the attribute on the event with the same name > /foo/ > to the value of the attribute on the dictionary." > > With a bit more massaging to use the right terms and so on, but that's > the basic idea. I guess this could work, but it seems kind of weird that readonly attributes are set this way. That is the reason I instead had them return internal concepts. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 26 June 2011 15:47:40 UTC