- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:23:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/progress/#interface-progressevent Can you have some text in the core spec such that constructors like the above can just be defined as: The FooEvent() constructor is an _Event Object Constructor_. ...or some such? Looks like the steps can be made generic easily; step 1 can just refer to "the interface that the constructor was called on" or some such (heycam can give you better text), the others are already generic except for the argument names, but you can just refer to the arguments by position rather than name. Then there'd be just one prose line and some IDL each time. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 18:24:30 UTC