- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:03:43 -0700
- To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>
- Cc: www-dom@w3.org
On Wednesday 2011-06-22 11:33 -0700, Ojan Vafai wrote: > While I agree that having keydown/keyup be symmetric would be a better API, > every browser currently implements it repeating keydown events. I don't > think we could change this without taking a significant compatibility hit. It was as I propose in Gecko as recently as Firefox 3.6, which is still quite widely used (and supported with security updates), so I don't think it should be a big compatibility hit. (It changed in Firefox 4 to match the spec.) (My testcase is holding down the "a" key on http://dbaron.org/tmp/key-event-dumper.html .) -David > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:25 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#events-keyboardevents says: > > # Holding down a key must result in the repeating the events > > # keydown, keypress (when supported by the user agent), and > > # textinput (when the keypress results in text input) in this > > # order, at a rate determined by the system configuration. > > > > I think this is a bad idea because it introduces asymmetry between > > the keydown and keyup events (which I think authors would reasonably > > expect to be symmetric) and because it defines keydown in a way that > > also violates a reasonable expectation -- that it be fired when the > > key is pressed (just like the existing "mousedown" event). > > > > Instead, I propose that key repetition be handled by repetitions of > > the keypress and textinput events, but that the keydown event not > > repeat. > > > > Changing this would also require that the keypress event fire for > > keys that do not produce a character value (e.g., arrow keys, > > backspace), which > > http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#events-keyboard-event-order > > says is not the case, since authors do need to detect repetitions of > > those keys. -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2011 19:04:09 UTC