- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 12:37:34 -0400
- To: "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-webapps-minutes.html keyboard events shepazu: I updated the spec based on hallword's (spelling?) notes <jrossi> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DOM-Level-3-Events/html/DOM3-Events.html#keys-keyCode-charCode-which shepazu: added supplementary idl for charCode/keyCode/which ... there lots of legacy stuff we don't need to specify, but legacy keyboard events are mainstream ... not making it normative though ... it is not appendix because I wanted to keep it there near other keyboard stuff ... will change it to appendix smaug: I'd suggest not using KeyboardEvent, but LegacyKeyboardEvent jrossi: Why not switch to WebIDL? shepazu: WebIDL is not stable enough yet jrossi: about WDC vs D3E ... I have a testpage about that ... D3E doesn't need to restrict what the event type string can be smaug: I agree ... the other difference is the exceptions from dispatchEvent jrossi: I like keeping the two different exceptions <jrossi> issue-178? <trackbot> ISSUE-178 -- Implementations and DOM Core allow empty string and null event types -- raised <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/178 resolution: accept the change request issue-178 <jrossi> issue-179? <trackbot> ISSUE-179 -- DOM Core uses INVALID_STATE_ERR (DOMException) where D3E uses DISPATCH_REQUEST_ERR (EventException) -- raised <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/179 resolution: it is useful to have separate exceptions for for different cases
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2011 16:38:25 UTC